Ford Find: Fan finds uncle’s long-lost ’46 hiding in barn

Ford Find: Fan finds uncle’s long-lost ’46 hiding in barn.

From http://www.oldcarsweekly.com

 

 

 

raustin |

 

 

Richard Cleer stumbled onto the 1946 Ford coupe his uncle built in the 1950s while searching for a flathead engine. He had to trade this tractor to bring the Ford back in the family.

 

By Angelo Van Bogart

 

Richard Cleer of Ipava, Ill., considers himself a Ford man and an International Harvester man, and he probably never thought he would have to betray his allegiance for one to get the other. However, that was the price Cleer had to pay when he retrieved a family heirloom earlier this year.

 

When Cleer found the 1946 Ford five-passenger coupe his uncle had hot-rodded in the 1950s just 25 miles from his home, he was actually following a lead to a 1939 flathead engine for another car.

 

“A guy said he had a 1939 Mercury flathead in the weeds,” said Cleer. “The engine in the weeds wasn’t right, so he said, ‘Maybe I have one in the barn.’”

 

The barn Cleer was taken to last fall was so overgrown with vines, trees and tall grass, it would have taken Indiana Jones to find it. When the owner cracked open the weathered red barn doors, Cleer saw the unmistakable shape of 1940s American iron.

 

Had he not been led to this overgrown barn, Cleer had little hope of ever stumbling onto the Ford his uncle built. Note the postwar Chrysler lurking in the barn; it was parked in front of the Ford.

 

“When he opened it up, I said, ‘That looks like my uncle’s old 1946 Ford,’” Cleer said. But he was mistaken. The car at the front of the barn was a 1946-’48 Chrysler. His uncle’s 1946 Ford was actually parked behind the Chrysler.

 

Cleer asked where the seller had bought the Ford coupe, and the man repeated the name of Cleer’s uncle. It had been parked since the early 1960s, not long after Cleer’s uncle sold it to the man. Cleer was able to further verify it was his uncle’s car, because all of the tell-tale modifications he remembered from his uncle’s Ford were still present. Blue paint still covered the Ford’s body, the push buttons were still in place to open the doors and the hood and deck lid had been de-chromed just the way Cleer remembered his uncle’s car.

 

Since the doors opened electrically and the long-parked Ford’s battery was dead, Cleer couldn’t determine whether the knob his uncle installed to open the deck lid from behind the seat was still there. Undeterred, he crawled in the side windows for a better look inside. Sure enough, that old knob was right where it should have been.

 

Despite Cleer’s excitement, he was told the Ford wasn’t for sale. Two months later, Cleer had worn down the Ford’s owner, although the Ford still wasn’t exactly for sale.

 

“He said, ‘If you want that car, you have to trade me for a John Deere tractor,’” Cleer said. “Well, I’m an International-Harvester man — I worked for International Harvester.”

 

Despite his allegiance, Cleer began searching for a John Deere tractor of the same value as the Ford, and one that would also satisfy the seller, to complete the trade.

 

“It took until May or June to find a tractor, because I didn’t want to get one he didn’t want and be stuck with it,” Cleer said.

 

Eventually, a John Deere was located at a dealership in Missouri, so Cleer called the Ford’s owner and asked him to call the dealership to make sure the tractor met his approval.

 

“He had the dealer run it for a half-hour, and he said it would be fine,” Cleer said.

 

After Cleer purchased the John Deere, the next challenge was retrieving the Ford from its approximately 50 years of storage. Although the brakes weren’t stuck, the Ford had been parked on a sandy floor, which helped preserve the sheet metal, but also caused the car to sink into the ground.

 

“It took four people five hours to get it loaded on the trailer,” Cleer said. “It had two flat tires, so we loaded it with used tires.”

 

After five hours of work, Cleer was finally able to retrieve the Ford from hiding. It was in remarkably good condition and exactly how his uncle had built it.

 

Once it was in the daylight, he finally had a good idea whether all of his efforts had been worthwhile.

 

“When I looked at it the first time, I didn’t have a flashlight and I didn’t know what it looked like,” he said. “It’s in really good shape — it’s really unbelievable. There’s just a little rust in the driver’s floor.

 

“It still has the same paint, and the interior my aunt put in it,” he added. “It looks like the seats and door panels are drape material.”

 

The Ford is still powered by the 1950 Mercury flathead with a 4-inch stroke that Cleer’s uncle installed with high-compression Edelbrock heads and dual 94 carburetors on an Edmunds intake. Cleer has already begun rebuilding the setup to make the Ford roadworthy again.

 

The 1950 Mercury flathead in the Ford still has its Edelbrock heads and Edmunds intake.

 

“I’m going to leave it that way,” Cleer said. “I had to pull the heads because it wouldn’t turn. I do all my own engine work but the machine work, and the machinist said [the engine] is in pretty good shape and the heads have never been ground.”

 

“It’s a good hot rod,” Cleer said, and one worth temporarily forsaking one tractor allegiance for another, even if the John Deere had the last jab.

 

“We had to use the tractor I traded to pull the cars out of the barn, and after we got the car loaded, I had to load the tractor and deliver it to his farm.”

 

 

 

1958 Ford Ranch Wagon Booster & SwiftSure Brake Pedal Assembly Reunited

http://ranchwagon.wordpress.com/2012/02/01/booster-swiftsure-brake-pedal-assembly-reunited

Posted: February 1, 2012 in Uncategorized
Tags: , ,

I cleaned and painted the rear booster bracket. After rebuilding the booster, I have decided to bolt the booster to the Brake pedal assembly. It fit just as it should, and can now box, and store this assembly. One more part of the restoration done! 7,329 more to go!

Reunited, and it feels so good….

1958 Ford Ranch Wagon- Control valve rebuilt

 

http://ranchwagon.wordpress.com/2012/05/13/control-valve-rebuilt/

Posted: May 13, 2012 in Uncategorized

So I spent Friday night dismantling the control valve, in order to soak it all overnight for a Saturday morning rebuild. It all came apart relatively easy. After having it all soak all night in some super clean, I cleaned it all up an then soaked all the internals and housing in some power steering fluid. I rebuilt the valve with a rebuild kit and a new ball stud kit as well. Then I coated the spool valve spring and nut with some white lithium grease and installed the end cap.

I then painted it in some chassis black semi-gloss and installed the stud boot and retainer. All done!

 

Thanks for reading.

Tim

 

Mustang II Diaries 2

Engine Work–Part I

When I first got the car, it had to warm up forever or it would stall. At stop lights, I had to be careful to feather the gas pedal to keep it from quitting on me. I enjoy an occasional adrenaline rush, but not at every intersection!
Anyway, our first order of business was to get the car running better. This would end up taking a while as we troubleshooted/fixed/replaced/fiddled with different parts of the engine over several months.
First, we ordered a rebuilt carburetor and my dad and I installed it. With the new carb, the car ran strong on straightaways with no hesitation but ran rough at slow speeds. After that, we did a tune up, replacing the spark plugs and wires, distributor cap and rotor.
Next, I drove the car to my brother’s place and he adjusted the fuel/air mixture, fiddled with the vacuum advance tubing, and reconnected the kickdown rod. The hesitation was 99 percent gone after all that. When I drove home I got stuck in bumper-to-bumper traffic and the car never stalled or overheated. Yay!
The last piece of the puzzle was the fuel pump, which was going bad. As soon as we replaced that (only $30), the car ran better than ever. Now I can drive it without worrying about being stranded (although I do have roadside assistance through my insurance so I can get a tow home if that happens).
Update: Even though the car is more reliable and runs smoothly now, the engine leaks oil, and could use a reseal. I’m hoping to get this done in September/October 2010 (more on this later).

Posted by Denice at 11:22 AM

Labels:

1991 Camaro

 

What We Drive – Jon’s ’91 Camaro

from:  Prestolite Performance   http://info.prestoliteperformance.com/111-what-we-drive-jon-s-91-camaro.html?utm_source=MailingList&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Automotive+Newsletter+7_26_12
Published on Thursday, 26 July 2012 14:55

What We Drive Volume 1, Jon's CamaroMeet Jon, one of our engineers here at Prestolite Performance. He is the focus of our first installment of What We Drive, our series of stories about the cars of Prestolite Performance employees. Jon got into cars when he was about 13 years old. His first car was a 1986 Ford Tempo that he worked on, but never got it to the road. His college car was a 1989 Chevy S10, which he beefed up by replacing the original 4 cylinder with a V8.

How Jon’s Camaro Went From 230 hp to Over 700 hp

Jon had been looking for a ’91 Camaro for some time, finding it difficult to locate one that wasn’t a rust bucket. In 2000, his search paid off and he purchased a nearly bone stock ’91 Camaro with only about 57,000 miles. The only performance upgrade on the car was a Flowmaster exhaust. Originally, the car made about 230 hp and 300 ft. lbs of torque.

The LB9 305 small block Chevy engine that was stock in Jon’s Camaro was removed to make way for a 355 small block. He hand ported aluminum Corvette heads and installed a Holley Stealth Ram intake with Mr. Gasket Ultra-Seal intake gaskets. Jon also made sure his engine was sealed for higher horsepower with Multi-Layered Steel head gaskets from Mr. Gasket. He made the engine even tougher with a forged ZZ4 crank, SRP forged pistons and a Comp camshaft.

Beefing up the drivetrain was also a priority so Jon installed a 4L80E transmission (built to handle 1000hp), Transgo shift kit, Lakewood transmission mount, SPOHN driveshaft, Detroit locker and Lakewood U-joints.

With twin 60mm Garret Turbos and his ACCEL 1000cfm throttle body and ACCEL Gen7 engine management system, Jon needed a hefty fuel delivery. His 5160FI fuel pump (now under Mallory) along with Mallory filters and high performance regulator provides the elite system needed for such a setup. For ignition, Jon used an ACCEL 300+ box with an ACCEL ultra coil and Extreme 9000 ceramic boot wires.

Now that Jon’s Camaro had been beefed up, he needed to harness the power with Lakewood 90/10 drag struts, panhard bar and control arms. He also needed better braking, so he installed 2002 SS Camaro brakes on all 4 corners.

All said and done, Jon’s beefed up ’91 Camaro now makes 700 hp and 800 ft. lbs of torque. That’s quite the improvement from stock.

See more Pictures

Beautiful Car!

Now that’s some plumbing!!!

Complete List of Improvements to Jon’s Camaro

Engine

Drivetrain

Power Adder

  • Twin 60mm Garret Turbos
  • Custom stainless headers

Fuel system

Engine management

Ignition

Exhaust

  • Custom 2-1/2″ down pipes
  • 4″ y-pipe back single exhaust
  • Dynatech muffler
  • Mr. Gasket ultra seal gaskets

Suspension

Brakes

  • 2002 SS Camaro brakes on all 4 corners
 Thanks for reading.
Tim

 

Mustang Muscle in the Mid 70′s Prt 4 1977

As it turned  out 1977 was one of the lower sales years.  The average since 1974 was around 180k or more.  For 1977 the sales number fell a bit short @ only 150K.  (Believe it or not that was more than Mustang sales for the 1971, 1972 and 1973 models!!).

There was some excitement for the 1977 Mustang.  For one thing the Cobra II could be had in white with red stripes and if that doesn’t stop your heart the options chrome luggage rack for the ’77 hard top coupe will.

You might be thinking, “Hey wait a minute!!!  Did he say ‘hard top’?  ‘Hard top’ as in there was something else?  Like a CONVERTIBLE?   THE CONVERTIBLE IS BACK?”    Well YES, if you spell it ‘T-TOP‘.

That’s not a bad-looking car!!! Agree?

The huge option for 1977 was the T-Top.  Frankly, I like T-Tops.  I had a Camaro with a T-Top and loved it.

Engine line up was the same as the previous years with the V8 302 (in the Cobra II package) producing 139 hp.

The Cobra package also include honeycomb wheels (or I think they were referred to as ‘lacy’).

Yeah..I guess they are more ‘lacy’ than ‘honeycomb’.

Thanks for reading and check out this blog.  The owner overs some of her issues when restoring a 1977 Mustang.

http://mustangiidiaries.blogspot.com/search/label/engine

Tim

Six Cylinder Super Charged

Technology has come a long way in the car world.  Early on getting 100 hp from an eight cylinder was tough, much less from a six cylinder.   Now days you can get a V6 Mustang with a base horse power for up to 305.  Add a super charger and you can squeeze out 427 hp from the same engine.  Yes technology as come a long way.  Really?That’s what I would have thought. Super charging has been around in the hot rod, drag racing world, for some time, but in a production, oh that’s fairly new (last 10 years or so).  But reading an article from Hemmings Motor New dispelled this notion I had.

So you’re thinking how far back was super charging something for sale to the general public, 60’s maybe…70’s maybe?  How about 1937?

Yes.  A car company by the name of Graham produced a 6 cylinder coupe.

1937 Graham Coupe

Supercharger badging

That’s a nice looking coupe.  Here is a shot of the super charged straight 6 and one of the charger it’s self.

 

Straight 6 cylinder.

 

 

The supercharger. This was Graham own design of a centrifugal super charger which they manufactured themselves.

They used this first on their straight eight engines then on the straight six.  They preformed so well that they nearly equaled the power of the eight-cylinder.  The car was lighter with the smaller engine and that helped it hit 60 mph in just 14.5 seconds by producing 112 hp.  The car came into chassis lengths 116 inches which had 106hp, 199.1 cid straight six and 120 inches which had 116hp 217.8 cid straight six.  What about gas mileage? How’s 23.95 MPG grab ya.

 

Thanks for reading.

Tim

FEATURE: 1978 VW Bus

This from Classic Recollections (http://classicrecollections.com/2012/07/16/feature-1978-vw-bus/).

I’ve never owned but  I have a brother-in-law who has restored a few – they weren’t show quality like this one but they were in fact fully functional.    Although WV buses required “frequent” attention, the repairs aren’t difficult, but I’m not sure the fun outweighed the trouble.

This 1978 VW Bus has undergone a 10 year restoration.

The first question most people are dying to ask when they spy Jack Connelly pull up in his 1978 VW Bus is, “Do you go camping in it?”

Jack Connolly has imparted his love of VWs to his kids: Anna and Jack Jr.

Who can blame them? For decades, these uber-functional hauling machines were the vehicles of choice for motorists who desired to get up close to the picturesque outdoors.

With their squared styling, compact rear-engine design and over-the-wheels driving position, these microbuses have interior space in overabundance. Add to this the Volkswagen camper model’s pop-up roof, and occupants are able to fully stand up.

**Want to know how Jack restored this roomy rolling classic? Head over to our full feature on the Daily Herald HERE**

________________________________________________________________________________________This 1978 VW Bus has been restored over a period of 10 years.This 1978 VW Bus was restored over 10 years.

This 1978 VW Bus has been restored over a period of 10 years.

Opening the side sliding door reveals the spacious interior that can accommodate all sorts of cargo.

 

Thanks for reading.

Tim

Engine Line Up – 1966 AMC

Often over looked is the first year AMC products.  AMC invested approximately 300 million dollars in  advanced engine designs, bodies and plant facilities as it prepared for the move from Nash Rambler hold over to AMC proper.

Of course the company was formed from Nash Rambler (AMC Rambler) in 1958 and eventually just American  Motors Corp.  So 1966 found a fair amount of “redesign” going on.   The available models for that year were:

Rambler American Rouge Series 01 (4dr w/V8)

Rambler Classic 770 Series 10 (2dr conv w/V8)  (4dr station wagon w/6cyl)

Rambler Rebel  Series (2dr w/V8)

Marlin Series 50 (2dr w/6 or V8) (My favorite besides the Javelin)

I love these cars. The two-tone paint is great. I love the yellow and black, blue and black and the silver and black combo.

Ambassador 990  Series 80 (4dr w/V8)

Rambler Ambassador 990  Series 80 (2d conv w/V8)

1966 Rambler Ambassador 990 Convertible

Rambler Ambassador DPL Series 80 (2dr w/V8)

Gone from the engine line up is the 196.5 6 cylinder overhead valve engine.  It was replaced with the 198.8 In Line Six. It was a cast iron block with overhead valves and a bore and stroke of 3.57 x 4.00 inches.  It displaced 198.8 cubic inches with a compression ratio of 85:1 and mustered up 128 hp. It was topped with a 1bbl Holley carb.  This was the base engine and all of the models could have been optioned with it.  But that wasn’t the only 6 banger the American 232 cid with produced 155 hp which sported a 2bbl Holley carb.

On the V8 side of things there was the 287 cid.  It was a cast iron block with overhead valves with a bore and stroke of 3.75 x 3.25 which produced a compression ratio of 8.7:1.  Topped with a 2bbl Holley (model 2209-2699) it made 198 hp.  The other option was the 327 cid that put out 270 hp and carried a 4bbl Holley on top.

New for that year was the 290 V8 (4.8L) it had a bore and stroke of 3.75 x 3.28  and with an iron block and overhead valves which produced 200 hp with a 2bbl plopped on top for 225 with a 4bbl carb.  Snap up the car with an original 290, only 623 of these engine were place in the 1966 models (all may the “American” models vs the “Classic” (those should have 287 instead).

The 290 used sparingly in the 1966 models.

The 327 was available in 1966. It was 5.4 liters with cast iron block.  The bore was increased over the 287 (they were similar set up) and it had hydraulic lifters.

The AMC 327 was similar to the 287, but displaced 327 cu in (5.4 L) due to the bore increase to 4.0 inches (102 mm). Unlike the 250, the 327 was available with hydraulic valve lifters.  The bore and stroke was 4.0 x 3.25  and topped with 2bbl carb it produced 250 hp.  Put the 4bbl option and you push it up to 270 hp.

I really these early AMC.

Thanks for reading.

Tim

Steve’s C4 Update

I've been fiddling a bit with the Vette.  I have a few projects to do now that I've become a lot more familiar with the car in the last two and a half months.

Although the car sounds cool, the cheap aftermarket mufflers are completely rusted inside.  The baffles are all loose with lots of holes.  On the outside they look new.  They are the source of most of the rattles.

The lumbar supports on the sport seats don't work.  I can't hear the pumps run so inspecting electrics first on those.

Rear speaker amps are toast.  Expensive so it's not high on the list.

Steve’s 1990 C4

Tranny service due.  No biggie and not expensive.

PRNDL lights are out.  Not bad considering it's 22 years old and all other lights work.  I was amazed at the sheer number of lights inside.  Courtesy lights and mood lighting.  The interior alone must have 15 individual lights.

Drivers side headlight motor needs to be repaired.  It works most of the time. LOL.

It's a pretty short list considering the age.

It pretty much sits in the garage.  We are in the 100's (110 today) this week so it's morning and evening use.  The ac does not work but it still has the factory seals on the service ports so I'm hoping for good news there.  We do have R12 available here.  I unbolted the roof when I got it and it hasn't been back on since.  I always wanted a convertible and the coupe is a good compromise.

The most annoying thing about the car is the static electricity. It doesn't shock me or anything but dust sticks to it like glue and the California duster only moves it from place to place.  I never thought about a "plastic" body in that way.  The duster works just fine on my steel cars.