So we are going to cover the offering for 1975, but before I continue I have a question for everyone.
It’s often said that the Mustang II was just a Pinto with different sheet metal. Is that true or false
I’ve got a free gift for the right detailed answer.
Post your answer on this blog.
Thanks for reading.
Tim
74 Pinto
74 Mustang
Are you still laughing at the title? I know, but keep in mind in the Mid 70’s, after a couple of years of low powered 4 and 6 cylinders, the V8 returned to the Mustang!!!! If nothing else it laid the ground for some of the best-selling and now very sought after Fox body ‘stangs. But we are going to discuss the cars before the Fox-body generation.
Model names like Ghia, 2+2, Mach 1, Cobra, Cobra II and King Cobra and cool stuff like T-Tops and front air dams and hood scoops.
It all started in 1974 when the Ford Mustang became the Mustang II and yes in some case you wouldn’t be able to pick them out of a pile of Pinto. You all know the story…EPA, emissions, gas prices, etc.
I’ve mentioned that there was a Mustang II in the family, back in 1978, it was a 1974 Mustang Ghia the 4 cylinder version. It met its demise one evening when a Ford Econoline Van took out the rear end while it was parked (after it careened over VW parked behind the ‘stang.
1974Ghia
So let’s take it year by year and cover the most “powerful” cars of 1974 to 1978.
1974:
The most powerful engine for 1974 was the V6. This was an option for all models but standard for the Mach 1 for that year. (The Mach 1 was hatch back.)
The Mach 1 – Hatch Back
The Mach 1 was powered by 2.8 L – 171 cid, V6, 2bbl, 105 hp (‘Z’ code) – the biggest engine available for the Mustang II that year (the other was the option was the I-4 2.3 L – 140 cid, 2bbl, 88 hp (‘Y’ code).
Sales for 1974 worked out like this:
69F Hatchback: 74,799
69R Hatchback – Mach 1: 44,046
60F Coupe: 177,671
60H Coupe – Ghia: 89,477
Total Production: 385,993
Thanks for reading.
Tim
by Amie Williams on June 13, 2012
 |
 |
However, another one just made an appearance on eBay motors in the form of a 2010 Mustang turned old school Boss 302. From the front it may seem to be an old school Boss 302, until you realize that the body is a bit different and then get a glance of that rear. Body panels added to this car go over the doors but replace the front hood and fenders. The rear deck lid panel is new and you can see that it also features the black hockey stick Boss stripes. The front and rear chrome bumpers are both from a 1969 Mustang. A good 58 lbs. have been lost and some of the weight has been transferred to the rear.
 |
 |
The interior features red leather seats and the same pattern is also on the door panels. The seats supposedly have no wear or tear and are in good condition, as well as the headliner and carpeting. Under the hood is the stock V8 complete with shaker hood with 34,973 miles logged on the odometer. This car is still under warranty until the end of September and the title obviously states that this is a 2010 Mustang.
What do you think of this retro Boss? Drop me a note.
I, personally, like it, in an odd sort of way. I’d have to see in it person.
Thanks for reading.
Tim
Here is a video clip of a Mustang during a road race. Driver was fine, but the Mustang really got some air.
Thanks for reading
Tim
YOU’VE BEEN WARNED. Now you are going to have to figure out how to explain why there will be Shelby Mustang GT500 in your driveway to your significant other.
Told ya not to watch!!! Here is some more.
Tim
Ok car and Mustang fans you are going to like this:
BOOM!
Agent 47 Harbinger Mustang for racing or street!!!
Isn’t that wicked looking?
They tried for the look of the 69 TransAm Mustang.
Shelby 1969 TransAm Mustang
The Harbinger is built for track or high performance street duty. Here are some specs and more pics. (Check out the racing video too.)
– Limited production of 250 serialized chassis
– Harbingers can be built using a brand new Dynacorn repro body or an existing 69 or 70 Mustang shell. {but it would have to be the fastback or sports back – not my ’70 Coupe 🙁 }
Race spec, low visual obstruction design, 12 point, chassis stiffening roll-cage of DOM steel.
Race proven SLA (double A-arm) Front suspension.
Ultra stable, Bill Osborne designed, V-link rear suspension.
Speedway Engineering 9” full floating rear axle.
Penske adjustable racing shocks with optional weight jacks at all four corners.
Ducted, low drag and lift hood, engineered and crafted by Agent 47.
Come ON!!! Tell me that’s not awesome!!!
Agent 47 designed vintage Recaro style racing seats.
Agent 47 designed, lightweight, Forgeline racing wheels.
Those are nice!!!
Brakes and master cylinders by AP racing.
Check out this set up.
16 lightweight components manufactured using the latest Rapid prototyping technology.
NVH controlled interior with strategic, lightweight, sound dampening materials.
A work of art. Very limited body roll with this set up. Much improved over the original ’69 TransAm
I’m not advertising for these guys, I just really like what they’ve done. There are parts for Fox bodied and other Mustangs as well.
Here a long racing video (cameras are set up for you can see how the body reacts to cornering).
http://www.agentfortyseven.com/harbinger/index.html
Thanks for reading.
Tim
Remember a few post ago that covered MOPAR’s in Sweden? (Short Link: http://wp.me/pKHNM-174) I wrote how interesting it was to see US sheet metal in other countries.
Well check out this car show in Rothrist, Switzerland. This is from Andres Palomares who lives in Bern, Switzerland. There are some great examples of US car history in this show.
Switzerland is beautiful and visited Interlaken several times while living in Europe.
Thanks for reading.
Tim
As a wrap up here are some videos.
Ok..this guy is clearly lost…Who brings a Mustang (even an extremely nice one) to an All Chevy Show:
Listen to this Chevy:
Two more to listen too:
And although there were a lot more entries for this show I’m going to end this series with one that brought back a lot of memories. This wasn’t a 1966 like my very first car, but it was pretty closed. Look over this Impala.
Thanks for reading.
Tim
No this isn’t going to be one of those talks and no we aren’t going to run out and hung a tree, ok…if you must…go ahead I’ll wait…..(insert bored whistling)……(more bored whistling)…..Ok…are you done?!!
As I get closer to getting the heads on the Mustang, I’m going to have to begin picking any changes I want made to the CJ heads. While cruising the web checking out options, I ran across this piece (Corvette related but springs are springs as far as an engine is concerned) and there are some good tips here.
Good reading.
Quick! What the fastest moving component in your engine? If you’ve taken a hint from the title of this article, you probably guessed correctly – it’s your valve springs, those tight little bundles of joy that open and close your engine’s valves.
Beehive springs come in a variety of shapes and sizes. The benefits of moving to Beehive springs where possible (and today few situations are not Beehive compatible) are many.
Beehive springs, such as those offered by COMP Cams, offer a huge number of benefits over stock-style cylindrical springs; reduced valve spring mass, faster valve acceleration, increased valve train rigidity, reduced valve train component stress and a whole laundry list of other positives.
Best of all, the word has gotten out and folks all over the country are using them for a wide variety of applications from street performance to extreme racing endeavors. That’s a really good thing.
Along with their success has come some confusion over exactly which beehive is right to purchase. Currently there are over a dozen beehive spring styles out there, each offering some unique take, be it in the seat pocket diameter, ovate wiring diameter, pitch or internal spring “frequency.” Regardless increased selection has bred some minor confusion, albeit easily cured.
Beehive springs are conical shaped springs that employ this powerful shape in the creation of a spring that can deliver both excellent performance and lowered seat pressures. With lower seat pressure, valve train components (especially the pushrods, rockers and lifters) are less stressed to perform the same work.
 |
 |
This beehive spring weights in at 99 grams, while a comparable conventional spring is 121 grams.
The difference between beehive and conventional cylindrical springs is obvious especially when you compare them in this manner. Note the dramatic difference in retainer diameter equating to less valve train weight.
According to COMP, effective beehive springs can support an additional 700rpm over stock cylindrical springs. How? It just stands to reason that the smaller coils at the top of the spring don’t require as much force to get the valve moving quickly, much quicker than conventional style springs. The higher rpm potential equates to better durability and performance.
There are some very knowledgeable engine builders who don’t understand how a single coil spring can be better than a dual conventional spring.
“Its like watching a race car running 60-foot elapsed times on the drag strip,” stated Bill Godbold, Chief Engineer for COMP Cams. “For example, take two identical cars with equivalent 500 hp engines.
“One has stock suspension and the other a sophisticated racing suspension. The car with the race suspension will get going more quickly and achieves better 60-foot time. The same principle works with beehive spring mechanics.”
Thanks for reading. Part II coming up.
Tim
Sometimes you just can’t pass up a pic. This one was from
Own Two Muscle Cars? Tell me about them.
Own Two Muscle Cars? Tell me about them.
Tim
